Head to head
shaft-mcp vs Archive
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
SHAFT browser automation, capture, and offline deterministic failure diagnosis
Full listingNo reviews yet
Zip and unzip archives from your AI chat: create, list, extract. Offline, with bomb guards.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours shaft-mcp (90/100 against 73). shaft-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| shaft-mcp | Archive | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A90/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 410 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |