Mmcp.market

Head to head

shaft-mcp vs MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

shaft-mcpio.github.ShaftHQ/shaft-mcp
A
No reviews yet

SHAFT browser automation, capture, and offline deterministic failure diagnosis

Full listing
MCPcom.slickfast/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Render 47 chart types and tiled dashboards as PNG/SVG. Deterministic, no headless browser.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 90). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; shaft-mcp runs on your own machine. shaft-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.

 shaft-mcpMCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA90/100A99/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars4100
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITAGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-192026-09-11
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

shaft-mcp vs SeleniumBase MCPshaft-mcp vs AIHawkshaft-mcp vs Ui.Vision MCPshaft-mcp vs walkerOS Source Browsershaft-mcp vs SafariAll Scraping and browsing servers