Head to head
Cork MCP vs Firefly Iii
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Every Cork API operation, plus cross-client risk attribution and exploitability-first vuln triage.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security-first, self-hosted MCP server for Firefly III — 152 operations behind 5 scoped tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Firefly Iii (83/100 against 75).
| Cork MCP | Firefly Iii | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 41 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 74 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-12 |
| Category | Security | Security |