Head to head
Cork MCP vs Reversecore MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Every Cork API operation, plus cross-client risk attribution and exploitability-first vuln triage.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security-first MCP server for reverse engineering, malware analysis, forensics, and SAST.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (75 and 77 out of 100). Reversecore MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Cork MCP | Reversecore MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 41 | 203 |
| Downloads / week | – | 128 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 44 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |