Head to head
SecHelix vs Cork MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Evidence-first security review of authorized repositories. Read-only, root-confined, no shell.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Every Cork API operation, plus cross-client risk attribution and exploitability-first vuln triage.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SecHelix (92/100 against 75).
| SecHelix | Cork MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 41 |
| Downloads / week | 58 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |