Head to head
Sentralis Portfolio Risk vs traql
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Crypto portfolio risk analysis: VaR, scenarios, liquidity and correlation engines as MCP tools.
Full listing
No reviews yet
AML risk scoring for crypto addresses and transactions on Ethereum, BSC, TRON, TON, Bitcoin
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours traql (85/100 against 60). Sentralis Portfolio Risk is hosted and callable through the gateway; traql runs on your own machine. traql has noticeably more public adoption.
| Sentralis Portfolio Risk | traql | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 53 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |