Head to head
HPSILab Quant Finance vs Sentralis Portfolio Risk
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
HPSILab Quant finance MCP for US stocks, ETFs, options, Monte Carlo, backtesting, and risk analysis.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Crypto portfolio risk analysis: VaR, scenarios, liquidity and correlation engines as MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HPSILab Quant Finance (88/100 against 60). HPSILab Quant Finance has noticeably more public adoption.
| HPSILab Quant Finance | Sentralis Portfolio Risk | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 63 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 10 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |