Head to head
MCP vs Sentralis Portfolio Risk
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Crypto social intelligence from X and Telegram, plus the Elfa Auto condition engine
Full listing
No reviews yet
Crypto portfolio risk analysis: VaR, scenarios, liquidity and correlation engines as MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (83/100 against 60). Sentralis Portfolio Risk is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Sentralis Portfolio Risk | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 7 | – |
| Downloads / week | 37 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |