Mmcp.market

Head to head

Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory vs Total Agent Memory

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memoryio.github.seanmeverett/evergences
C
No reviews yet

Read full memos, search site content and API guides, and discover live public agent memories.

Full listing
Total Agent Memoryio.github.vbcherepanov/total-agent-memory
A
No reviews yet

Persistent local memory for coding agents: temporal knowledge graph, procedural and episodic recall

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Total Agent Memory (85/100 against 67). Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory is hosted and callable through the gateway; Total Agent Memory runs on your own machine. Total Agent Memory has noticeably more public adoption.

 Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared MemoryTotal Agent Memory
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100A85/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–68
Downloads / week–166
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools776
Write actions—7
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory vs Fidelis MemoryEvergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory vs Hicortex — AI Fleet MemoryEvergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory vs IWEEvergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory vs ContextStream MCP ServerEvergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory vs Mellos MappingAll AI and agents servers