Mmcp.market

Head to head

ContextStream MCP Server vs Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

ContextStream MCP Serverio.github.contextstream/mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Project memory, semantic code search, and grounded agent context.

Full listing
Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memoryio.github.seanmeverett/evergences
C
No reviews yet

Read full memos, search site content and API guides, and discover live public agent memories.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ContextStream MCP Server (96/100 against 67). ContextStream MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.

 ContextStream MCP ServerEvergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA96/100C67/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars43–
Downloads / week964–
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools—7
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-15—
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

ContextStream MCP Server vs ProjectmemContextStream MCP Server vs Linksee MemoryContextStream MCP Server vs Agent Memory OsContextStream MCP Server vs IWEContextStream MCP Server vs Google SurfAll AI and agents servers