Mmcp.market

Head to head

Fidelis Memory vs Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Fidelis Memoryio.github.hermes-labs-ai/fidelis-memory
B
No reviews yet

Recall locally stored agent memories through an MCP-compatible host.

Full listing
Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memoryio.github.seanmeverett/evergences
C
No reviews yet

Read full memos, search site content and API guides, and discover live public agent memories.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Fidelis Memory (83/100 against 67). Evergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fidelis Memory runs on your own machine. Fidelis Memory has noticeably more public adoption.

 Fidelis MemoryEvergences — Memos, Content and Shared Memory
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C67/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars23–
Downloads / week382–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools—7
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-19—
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Fidelis Memory vs Total Agent MemoryFidelis Memory vs Hicortex — AI Fleet MemoryFidelis Memory vs Agent Memory OsFidelis Memory vs Claude Real VideoFidelis Memory vs IWEAll AI and agents servers