Mmcp.market

Head to head

PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCPio.github.pineforge-4pass/pineforge-backtest-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Offline PineScript v6 → C++ backtests at deterministic TradingView parity, run locally via MCP.

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 83 out of 100). SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCPSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars7745
Downloads / week–9.3k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-152026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs Azure MCP ServerPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs SemioticPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs World MonitorPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs NetdataPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerAll Everything else servers