Head to head
Semiotic vs PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Verified React chart generation: select, validate, repair, render, and inspect charts through MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Offline PineScript v6 → C++ backtests at deterministic TradingView parity, run locally via MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (82 and 85 out of 100). Semiotic is hosted and callable through the gateway; PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP runs on your own machine. Semiotic has noticeably more public adoption.
| Semiotic | PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2.7k | 7 |
| Downloads / week | 5.8k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |