Mmcp.market

Head to head

PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs World Monitor

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCPio.github.pineforge-4pass/pineforge-backtest-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Offline PineScript v6 → C++ backtests at deterministic TradingView parity, run locally via MCP.

Full listing
World Monitorapp.worldmonitor/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Live markets, conflicts, country risk, chokepoints, energy, and China decision signals. 75 tools.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours World Monitor (95/100 against 85). World Monitor is hosted and callable through the gateway; PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP runs on your own machine. World Monitor has noticeably more public adoption.

 PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCPWorld Monitor
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA85/100A95/100
AdoptionGrowingWidely used
GitHub stars787k
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITAGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-152026-09-19
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs Azure MCP ServerPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs SemioticPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs NetdataPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs jCodemunch MCPAll Everything else servers