Head to head
Crg vs Ref Tools
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Crg
Bio.github.n24q02m/crgNo reviews yet
Token-efficient code review knowledge graph: semantic search and call-graph resolution.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Token-efficient search for coding agents over public and private documentation.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Ref Tools (87/100 against 75). Ref Tools is hosted and callable through the gateway; Crg runs on your own machine.
| Crg | Ref Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A87/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 76 | 1.2k |
| Downloads / week | 1.1k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-10-13 | 2026-10-01 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |