MCP.Market

Head to head

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs three.ws Agent Payments

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsio.github.MikeyPetrillo/agent402
A
No reviews yet

Agentic Finance: 500+ agent tools, multi-chain USDC over x402 or MPP, or free via proof-of-work

Full listing
three.ws Agent Paymentsio.github.nirholas/agentcore-payments-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Governed x402 payment sessions: pay any endpoint with budget, allowlist & per-tx caps, no key.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools (92/100 against 83). Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Agent Payments runs on your own machine.

 Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web toolsthree.ws Agent Payments
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B83/100
AdoptionEstablishedEstablished
GitHub stars39265
Downloads / week41890
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
Last release2026-10-022026-11-02
CategoryFinanceFinance

Other comparisons

Agent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs BlockrunAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs Finance ToolkitAgent402.Tools: pay-per-call web tools vs X402 ListAll Finance servers