Head to head
Litescrape vs Shodan Search MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Google Maps search results, free without an API key.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Defensive Shodan search and host intelligence MCP using customer-provided SHODAN_API_KEY for
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Litescrape (89/100 against 70). Litescrape has noticeably more public adoption.
| Litescrape | Shodan Search MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 74 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 9 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |