Head to head
Google Maps MCP Server vs Litescrape
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
18 Google Maps tools for AI agents — geocode, search, directions, weather, and more.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Google Maps search results, free without an API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Litescrape (92/100 against 83). Litescrape is hosted and callable through the gateway; Google Maps MCP Server runs on your own machine. Google Maps MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Google Maps MCP Server | Litescrape | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 459 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 3.2k | 74 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 9 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |