Head to head
HasData Google Scholar vs Litescrape
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Google Scholar search results, citation counts and citation export formats, as structured JSON.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Google Maps search results, free without an API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HasData Google Scholar (100/100 against 89).
| HasData Google Scholar | Litescrape | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 10 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 41 | 74 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 9 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |