Head to head
Litescrape vs Octocode
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Google Maps search results, free without an API key.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 94 out of 100). Litescrape is hosted and callable through the gateway; Octocode runs on your own machine. Octocode has noticeably more public adoption.
| Litescrape | Octocode | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 475 |
| Downloads / week | 74 | 467 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 9 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |