Head to head
socraticode vs Litescrape
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for enterprise local codebase indexing, semantic search, and code dependency graphs.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Google Maps search results, free without an API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Litescrape (92/100 against 65). Litescrape is hosted and callable through the gateway; socraticode runs on your own machine. socraticode has noticeably more public adoption.
| socraticode | Litescrape | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3.3k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 5.2k | 74 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 9 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |