Head to head
Anteater MCP vs Octocode
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
UCI course search and registration planning: live sections, grades, prerequisites, conflicts.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Octocode (94/100 against 73). Octocode has noticeably more public adoption.
| Anteater MCP | Octocode | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 475 |
| Downloads / week | – | 467 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |