Head to head
GitHits vs Anteater MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search public open-source code, documentation, metadata, vulnerabilities, changelogs, and examples.
Full listing
No reviews yet
UCI course search and registration planning: live sections, grades, prerequisites, conflicts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GitHits (92/100 against 73). GitHits is hosted and callable through the gateway; Anteater MCP runs on your own machine. GitHits has noticeably more public adoption.
| GitHits | Anteater MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 107 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 3.1k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |