Mmcp.market

Head to head

SearXNG Search vs Anteater MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SearXNG Searchio.github.ihor-sokoliuk/mcp-searxng
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading

Full listing
Anteater MCPio.github.KKazuhaK/anteater-mcp
B
No reviews yet

UCI course search and registration planning: live sections, grades, prerequisites, conflicts.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SearXNG Search (83/100 against 73). SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.

 SearXNG SearchAnteater MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100B73/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars1.2k0
Downloads / week13k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITAGPL-3.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryWeb searchWeb search

Other comparisons

SearXNG Search vs Zotero MCPSearXNG Search vs Books & Papers MCP ServerSearXNG Search vs WebSearch MCP ServerSearXNG Search vs My WebsearchSearXNG Search vs GroundhogAll Web search servers