MCP.Market

Head to head

SearXNG Search vs CLIO Web

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

SearXNG Searchio.github.ihor-sokoliuk/mcp-searxng
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading

Full listing
CLIO Webio.github.iowarp/web-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Provider-fixed web search plus transparent URL, DOI, and document fetching

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours CLIO Web (94/100 against 83). SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.

 SearXNG SearchCLIO Web
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A94/100
AdoptionEstablishedEstablished
GitHub stars1.3k30
Downloads / week13k8.9k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITBSD-3-Clause
Last release2026-09-292026-10-28
CategoryWeb searchWeb search

Other comparisons

SearXNG Search vs Free SearchSearXNG Search vs searxNcrawlAll Web search servers