Mmcp.market

Head to head

Husk vs Config Audit

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Huskio.github.husk-security/husk
A
No reviews yet

Local-first defensive scanner for vulnerable dependencies, leaked secrets, and risky agent configs

Full listing
Config Auditio.github.jmshinhwa/mcp-config-audit
A
No reviews yet

Audit one mcp.json for what an agent config gives away — inline API keys, unpinned npx launches, pla

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 89 out of 100). Husk has noticeably more public adoption.

 HuskConfig Audit
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA91/100A89/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars60
Downloads / week72–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-142026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Husk vs Agent-Native ChatHusk vs haiku.ragHusk vs HOL GuardHusk vs Munim Computer UseHusk vs FitterAll AI and agents servers