Head to head
Husk vs Fitter
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first defensive scanner for vulnerable dependencies, leaked secrets, and risky agent configs
Full listing
No reviews yet
Turn any website or API into structured JSON with LLM-authored declarative scraping configs.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (91 and 88 out of 100).
| Husk | Fitter | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 133 |
| Downloads / week | 72 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-08-29 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |