Head to head
Agent-Native Chat vs Husk
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Minimal chat-first app with durable threads, actions, and the app-agent loop
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first defensive scanner for vulnerable dependencies, leaked secrets, and risky agent configs
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (98 and 91 out of 100). Agent-Native Chat is hosted and callable through the gateway; Husk runs on your own machine. Agent-Native Chat has noticeably more public adoption.
| Agent-Native Chat | Husk | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.9k | 6 |
| Downloads / week | – | 72 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |