Head to head
SEO Audit Console vs squirrelscan
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Technical SEO in Claude: GSC + crawl + DataForSEO - audit, portfolio, market sizing, content recon.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Website QA for your coding agent: audit SEO, performance, security, accessibility over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SEO Audit Console (85/100 against 69). squirrelscan is hosted and callable through the gateway; SEO Audit Console runs on your own machine.
| SEO Audit Console | squirrelscan | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 89 | 308 |
| Downloads / week | 680 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 27 |
| Write actions | — | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-07 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |