Head to head
Guaardvark vs WaveSpeed
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local AI studio on your GPU: images, video, music, voice, RAG. Needs the Guaardvark app installed.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours WaveSpeed (98/100 against 82). WaveSpeed is hosted and callable through the gateway; Guaardvark runs on your own machine.
| Guaardvark | WaveSpeed | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 288 | 36 |
| Downloads / week | 335 | 3.9k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-10-24 | 2026-10-29 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |