Mmcp.market

Head to head

RE-call MCP Memory Server vs Memory Vault

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

RE-call MCP Memory Serverio.github.GiulioDER/re-call
B
No reviews yet

Agent memory on your own Postgres that flags superseded facts and abstains instead of guessing.

Full listing
Memory Vaultio.github.MihaiBuilds/memory-vault
B
No reviews yet

Local-first AI memory layer with hybrid search. Postgres + pgvector. Self-hosted, MIT.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours RE-call MCP Memory Server (80/100 against 70).

 RE-call MCP Memory ServerMemory Vault
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB80/100B70/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars463
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-14
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

RE-call MCP Memory Server vs Echo MemoryRE-call MCP Memory Server vs EngraphyRE-call MCP Memory Server vs NeonRE-call MCP Memory Server vs PostgreSQLRE-call MCP Memory Server vs RememAll Databases servers