Head to head
Engraphy vs RE-call MCP Memory Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Self-hosted MCP memory server: a typed knowledge graph on Postgres 16 and pgvector.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Agent memory on your own Postgres that flags superseded facts and abstains instead of guessing.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (73 and 80 out of 100).
| Engraphy | RE-call MCP Memory Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |