Mmcp.market

Head to head

PostgreSQL vs RE-call MCP Memory Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

PostgreSQLio.github.antonorlov/mcp-postgres-server
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for PostgreSQL: local, Docker, RDS, Neon, Supabase, or behind an SSH bastion.

Full listing
RE-call MCP Memory Serverio.github.GiulioDER/re-call
B
No reviews yet

Agent memory on your own Postgres that flags superseded facts and abstains instead of guessing.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (83 and 80 out of 100). PostgreSQL has noticeably more public adoption.

 PostgreSQLRE-call MCP Memory Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100B80/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars224
Downloads / week2.9k–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools6—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-162026-09-19
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

PostgreSQL vs NeonPostgreSQL vs PostgreSQL MCP ServerPostgreSQL vs Postgres AIopsPostgreSQL vs DB AccessPostgreSQL vs health4aiAll Databases servers