Head to head
freeq vs YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and verify freeq conversations: channels, history, search, signatures, pins.
Full listingYouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP
Bcom.getyoutubetranscript/youtube-transcript-and-youtube-searchNo reviews yet
YouTube transcripts, search, channel browsing, and playlists for AI agents via MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 84 out of 100). freeq has noticeably more public adoption.
| freeq | YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 85 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-12 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |