Head to head
freeq vs tc39-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and verify freeq conversations: channels, history, search, signatures, pins.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Independent MCP server for the TC39 specs (ECMA-262 + ECMA-402): clauses, search, diffs, history.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 85 out of 100).
| freeq | tc39-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 85 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 112 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 17 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |