Head to head
freeq vs Agenticmemory
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read and verify freeq conversations: channels, history, search, signatures, pins.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Persistent memory for AI agents — history, context, semantic search, queues. 17 tools, stdio/SSE.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 83 out of 100).
| freeq | Agenticmemory | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 85 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 79 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 17 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |