Mmcp.market

Head to head

Fidren vs mcp-local-rag

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Fidrennet.fidren/counterparty
C
No reviews yet

Checks a counterparty before an AI agent pays: what the evidence supports, and for how much.

Full listing
mcp-local-ragio.github.shinpr/mcp-local-rag
A
No reviews yet

Easy-to-setup local RAG server with minimal configuration

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-local-rag (92/100 against 60). Fidren is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-local-rag runs on your own machine. mcp-local-rag has noticeably more public adoption.

 Fidrenmcp-local-rag
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100A92/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–399
Downloads / week–4.7k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Fidren vs ha-mcpFidren vs IWEFidren vs fiori-mcp-serverFidren vs mcp-ts-coreFidren vs mockserverAll AI and agents servers