Head to head
Fidren vs ha-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Fidren
Cnet.fidren/counterpartyNo reviews yet
Checks a counterparty before an AI agent pays: what the evidence supports, and for how much.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for managing Home Assistant through AI assistants.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (60 and 55 out of 100). Fidren is hosted and callable through the gateway; ha-mcp runs on your own machine. ha-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| Fidren | ha-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | C55/100 |
| Adoption | New | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 4.8k |
| Downloads / week | – | 67k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |