Head to head
mcp-ts-core vs Fidren
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Fidren
Cnet.fidren/counterpartyNo reviews yet
Checks a counterparty before an AI agent pays: what the evidence supports, and for how much.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (55 and 60 out of 100). Fidren is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-ts-core runs on your own machine. mcp-ts-core has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-ts-core | Fidren | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 151 | – |
| Downloads / week | 33k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |