Head to head
Feranor Resilience vs Passiv Web Tools
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Scan/purge hidden text & score web domains: TLS, DNS, headers, speed. Free scans, $0.01 actions.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Free web tools for AI agents: HTML to Markdown, compliance scan, page profile, security headers.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Passiv Web Tools (70/100 against 60). Feranor Resilience is hosted and callable through the gateway; Passiv Web Tools runs on your own machine.
| Feranor Resilience | Passiv Web Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | New | New |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | Security | Security |