Head to head
Feranor Resilience vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Scan/purge hidden text & score web domains: TLS, DNS, headers, speed. Free scans, $0.01 actions.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Security tools for your AI: scan, pentest, check headers, guard code and scan repos for secrets.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (86/100 against 60). Feranor Resilience is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Feranor Resilience | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 778 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Security | Security |