Head to head
Feranor Resilience vs mcp-audit
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Scan/purge hidden text & score web domains: TLS, DNS, headers, speed. Free scans, $0.01 actions.
Full listingmcp-audit
Aio.github.saagpatel/mcp-auditNo reviews yet
Scan, enumerate, and risk-score every MCP server configured on your machine.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-audit (89/100 against 60). Feranor Resilience is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-audit runs on your own machine. mcp-audit has noticeably more public adoption.
| Feranor Resilience | mcp-audit | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | 41 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | 13 |
| Write actions | 2 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |