Head to head
AIHawk vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Reliable web access for AI agents: smart HTTP, rotating proxies, and full-browser rendering.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours AIHawk (92/100 against 84). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; AIHawk runs on your own machine. AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.
| AIHawk | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 32k | 4 |
| Downloads / week | 6.0k | 444 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 16 | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |