Head to head
PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) vs Postgres Redis Compose Generator
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only)
Cio.github.Eszetael/postgres-mcp-hardenedNo reviews yet
Read-only PostgreSQL over MCP. Writes refused at the parsed SQL, plus a READ ONLY transaction.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (68 and 62 out of 100). Postgres Redis Compose Generator is hosted and callable through the gateway; PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) runs on your own machine. PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) has noticeably more public adoption.
| PostgreSQL (hardened, read-only) | Postgres Redis Compose Generator | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C68/100 | C62/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | – |
| Downloads / week | 91 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-20 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |