Head to head
Git Archaeologist vs Palinode
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Git Archaeologist
Cio.github.engrmaziz/git-archaeologistNo reviews yet
Trace code history, commit reasoning, and PR context directly from Git logs.
Full listingPalinode
Cio.github.phasespace-labs/palinodeNo reviews yet
Inspectable, correctable project memory in git-versioned Markdown for AI agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (65 and 66 out of 100). Palinode has noticeably more public adoption.
| Git Archaeologist | Palinode | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | C66/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 40 |
| Downloads / week | – | 503 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 2 | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |