Head to head
Git Archaeologist vs Repowise
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Git Archaeologist
Cio.github.engrmaziz/git-archaeologistNo reviews yet
Trace code history, commit reasoning, and PR context directly from Git logs.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Codebase intelligence for AI coding agents — graph, git history, docs, decisions, code health.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Repowise (82/100 against 65). Repowise has noticeably more public adoption.
| Git Archaeologist | Repowise | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 7.1k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 2 | 19 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-27 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |