Head to head
Git Archaeologist vs SoloMD
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Git Archaeologist
Cio.github.engrmaziz/git-archaeologistNo reviews yet
Trace code history, commit reasoning, and PR context directly from Git logs.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read and search a folder of Markdown notes: search, backlinks, tags, tasks, outlines, git history.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SoloMD (83/100 against 65). SoloMD has noticeably more public adoption.
| Git Archaeologist | SoloMD | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 1.1k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-24 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |