Head to head
Thinkrun vs Zenrows
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Browser control + session recording MCP for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor) — real Chrome.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Zenrows MCP server — Fetch, Extract, Batch, and Browser Sessions for AI coding assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 92 out of 100). Zenrows is hosted and callable through the gateway; Thinkrun runs on your own machine. Zenrows has noticeably more public adoption.
| Thinkrun | Zenrows | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 19 |
| Downloads / week | 44 | 500 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 54 | — |
| Write actions | 7 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |