Mmcp.market

Head to head

Safari vs Thinkrun

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Safariio.github.achiya-automation/safari-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Native Safari browser automation for AI agents — 98 tools, zero Chrome overhead.

Full listing
Thinkrunio.github.dundas/thinkrun
A
No reviews yet

Browser control + session recording MCP for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor) — real Chrome.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Thinkrun (92/100 against 69). Safari has noticeably more public adoption.

 SafariThinkrun
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC69/100A92/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars2042
Downloads / week2.6k44
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—54
Write actions—7
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-21
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Safari vs TapSafari vs Browser UseSafari vs Agent360 Browser MCPSafari vs Native DevToolsSafari vs FableCutAll Scraping and browsing servers