Head to head
peek vs Thinkrun
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Exposes recorded browser sessions (rrweb DOM, console, network) to AI coding agents, fully local
Full listing
No reviews yet
Browser control + session recording MCP for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor) — real Chrome.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Thinkrun (92/100 against 74).
| peek | Thinkrun | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 7 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 51 | 44 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 19 | 54 |
| Write actions | 2 | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-07-10 | 2026-09-21 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |